Home > Finance, Investing, Tech Stocks > Will Google be the Next Ponzi Scheme to Fail?

Will Google be the Next Ponzi Scheme to Fail?

Here is a provocative take on an internet juggernaut: is nothing but a giant Ponzi scheme that is coming undone as I write.

This is not an accusation, but more a hypothesis.  What gives this hypothesis legs is a recent discovery that is aggressively cracking down on so-called “violators” of the terms and conditions of its "Adsense" program.  My own website recently fell victim to this ruthless and mindless activity.  We have been gradually building our readership and hence our traffic through the combined effort of good, original content of the financial kind, and a parallel effort to monetize our traffic so we can continue offering this commentary at no cost to the reader.  

As measured by various metrics tools for the internet, we were succeeding at Wealth-Ed.com and were just beginning to gain some traction with readers.  Our writings are picked up now by SeekingAlpha.com  and our insights and observations are available to many.  Our well-timed pieces on General Growth Properties and more recently on the prospects for natural gas ETF, UNG, caused our views to spike.  It was not through any illicit effort to create fictional traffic that our page views increased, but through hard and time consuming work combined with good luck and timing.  Naturally, as our traffic increased, so did the balance in our Adsense account. 

Then, without warning two weeks ago, our account was not suspended, but was permanently canceled by , apparently for all time.  And our Adsense revenues were absconded by .  Not just this website, but any other website we should ever develop is also barred from any relationship with the Adsense program.  Again, there was no warning, no real chance to appeal (only a token automated email appeal form that returned a computer generated rejection).  I was floored.  How can a company that claims it wants to “do no Evil” justify this malevolence?  is no longer the white knight, but has become Darth Vader.

We at “Wealth-Ed.com” could not believe that we were somehow singled out from the millions of similar websites that have been created and that utilize Adsense to help pay for the effort in some small way.  We had done nothing wrong that we knew of that violated ’s rules.  The relationship between small website or blog developer and is supposed to be symbiotic.  Small websites like ours put on the map. 

attracts advertisers because it has such great reach and exposure through millions of small websites.  It needs the billions of webpages to provide the internet real estate and associated “eyeballs” to sell to its advertisers.  depends on small businesses and entrepreneurs more than any other internet or computer based software company.  , SAP and Oracle all rely on large business customers for the bulk of their revenues.  But is almost entirely dependent on its ad-based business model that is dispensed through a myriad of startup websites.  “Wealth-Ed.com” and all other similar small, entrepreneurial webpages on the “net” allow to exist.

So, how does figure to go forward by biting the hand that feeds it?  This is a question that must be asked by any investor.  My only answer is that is in big financial trouble that is not yet revealed by their published financial statements.  This trouble comes from the same place that has exposed many other Ponzi schemes recently, most notably, Bernie Madoff’s.  As the economy falters and advertising revenues dry up, is losing its primary source of income.  It is no longer able to take money from one source, advertisers, and give it to another, Adsense ad posters, to keep the pyramid upright.

A good Ponzi requires a very convincing story which generates substantial public interest.  The Ponzi sponsor then monetizes this public interest by collecting funds with a promise of great returns.  The returns are generated by money brought in from other participants, not from any specific benefit created by the Ponzi artist.  The Ponzi speculation is a little more subtle, which also makes it a little harder to uncover.  Its scheme is supposedly made legitimate by a multi-paged, “fine print” contract that gives it the ability to shut down any website for just about any reason imaginable, or no reason at all except at the whim of .  But is this contract really legal and enforceable?

As we started researching the crackdown on small businesses, we uncovered that there are thousands of others in the same situation.  Many of our fellow small website developers have written about their own experience and loss of Adsense revenues.  Many describe that it happened to them just as it happened to us:  with no warning, no real chance of appeal, no one at to talk to, and unilateral confiscation of all their earned Adsense revenue.  One such participant, Aaron Greenspan's "Think Computer", was officed in the same county in California as , Santa Clara. Greenspan took Google to small claims court…and won!  (and then lost on appeal to a bevy of lawyers). I am sure knows that most web owners are not in a position to sue and wanted to drive the fruitlessness of litigation home by the appeal.  Once again, demonstrated its utter contempt of the same customers and business partners who have made it what it is.

As continues to cut off its advertising partners reducing the number of ad page views what will the advertisers think?  ’s viewership will be greatly reduced and so will their ad traffic.  The advertisers will respond by cutting back even further on their advertising.  revenue will subsequently fall as will its profits, which may turn to losses given the enormous overhead created by the recent reckless moves by the management of



The stock has a lofty price and multiple to earnings.  It is valued as though it will continue to grow at 20% a year well into the future. But, if ad revenues and profits drop as we think they might, stock should be sold or shorted.  's latest attempt to remake itself into a full-featured business software company will cost it a king's ransom. Taking on , Oracle and SAP on their own turf could be the demise of . Hubris has its costs. Shorting stock is how we plan to recoup our losses of Adsense revenue.

Related Blog Links
Share the Wealth!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. Microsoft Gets Yahoo Deal Done
  2. Microsoft’s BING is giving Google Fits
  3. Alexa Page Rank

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Finance, Investing, Tech Stocks
  1. July 12th, 2009 at 11:19 | #1

    Excellent article on Google and Adsence. We are part of the small armies of companies that was increasing our income and survival with the help of Adsence. Only to get shut out for unexplained reasons, and standard kiss off email. Plus loss of our income for that quarter. We will never be allowed to use Adsence again, according to their laws or policy. We give out reliable, free info on real estate and mortgage matters, we are all volunteers. What a slap to us, and our web site has been put on hold since.
    We begged for a review, we promised to correct any mistake that we may of occurred, to no prevail.
    Some of the people we have talked to are forming groups to click on any Adsence and writing the clicked companies telling them they are doing this as a protest and to let Google credit them back. Since there are many, the can’t capture their computer ID to restrict this protest. Some will soon Twitter this, blog and other means to get the message across. I think this might be a good idea. Join us.

  2. July 12th, 2009 at 19:50 | #2

    Kris, you are correct. Basically, it seems as though Google, at first, appreciates the advertising when a small website or company starts using the Adsense service, but as soon as they start making any sort of reasonable income, Google shuts them down with no reasoning and what’s worse is that they don’t even legitimately review suspensions, it is all computer automated. Eventually this will be their downfall as there are a vast variety of other CPC networks out there which will eventually overtake Google as the leader. They will get what is coming to them.

  3. August 30th, 2009 at 09:43 | #3

    It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by trying to solve this issue instead of looking at why their is a problem in the first place.

  4. August 31st, 2009 at 11:19 | #4

    That doesn’t make any sense.
    Jared´s last blog ..General Growth is Progressing on Schedule My ComLuv Profile

  5. September 22nd, 2009 at 14:49 | #5

    Thanks! Good stuff here! I appreciate your insite. Will be back to check often.

  6. alex farguson
    September 23rd, 2009 at 01:00 | #6

    Please, can you PM me and tell me few more thinks about this, I am really fan of your blog…

  7. jack parler
    September 23rd, 2009 at 03:28 | #7

    Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again – taking you feeds also, Thanks.

  8. September 23rd, 2009 at 08:58 | #8

    Great articles & Nice a site

  1. July 12th, 2009 at 09:51 | #1
  2. July 14th, 2009 at 09:56 | #2
CommentLuv Enabled