Undeniably Emploment Lags the Stock Market

November 23rd, 2009 Brian No comments

There is really no debate about the point that unemployment levels lag the stock market. The data is clear on this. Even if one wants to challenge the accuracy of the level of unemployment, the trend is the same. This past Friday saw the passing of the level of 10% unemployment in America.  This level was thought to have been a severe psychological barrier to market participants and the market had sold off the two weeks previous in anticipation of that result.  The number was announced on Friday morning, and….nothing.  The market barely reacted.  And for good reason.

In each of the past six recessions, regardless of cause or severity, the stock market led the recovery in employment by 4-9 months. Examples of the stock market bottom followed by the peak level of unemployment in each cycle include: June 1949 vs. November 1949 (5 months), September 1960 vs. May 1961 (8 months), September 1974 vs. May 1975 (8 months), June v. December 1982 (6 months), November 1991 vs. June 1992 (7 months) and February vs. June 2003 (4 months). It stands to reason that the more severe the recession, the higher the level of unemployment and the longer it will take for the employment cycle to reverse direction. This can be seen in the data as the longest recovery lags were the severe 1974-75 recession and the 1960-61 recession.
The current recession is the deepest since the 1930s (for which there are no government employment series to compare with the current event). But if the stock market started its recovery in 1974 eight months prior to employment recovery in 1975, it is reasonable to expect an even longer lag in this recovery, perhaps a year.
By March 2010, we should see employment levels improving and unemployment rates declining. Any recovery between now and then is a bonus. There should be no expectation that we see increasing employment rates between now and year end. 

The source of my data is the FRED data bases maintained by the St. Louis Federal Reserve.  Check it out here for more info.

One Last Look at General Growth Properties

November 22nd, 2009 Brian 1 comment

All good things must come to an end.  In the case of my ownership of General Growth Properties stock (GGP was its ticker before bankruptcy filing), the end is near.  Why? Anyone following GGP will already know this, but just in case you don’t, the price per share moved from $4 to $7 in a matter of a couple weeks.  This move, and the reasons for it, mean it is now time to part ways with a very good stock pick (originally bought in April at $0.63 / share).

Three good things happened for GGP the past two weeks:

1. GGP released its 3rd Quarter financials on Monday, November 9.  They were better than expected.  Year over Year (YOY) results were down, naturally, given the near depression we have experienced since Q3 2008.  But they were down much less than had been expected by analysts still following the company.  Cash Flow (FFO) was actually positive by $671M ($2/share) when $700M of one-time, non-cash expeneses are added back while revenue and operating earnings were down only marginally (less than 5%).  The ”comprehensive” earnings were down substantially because of the large non-cash impairment charge to reserve for future unknown expenses attributable to the very weak economy.  But all in all, the Q3 report was very encouraging.

2. The second big news event happened early last week (November 17) when  Simon Properties (SPG), the other really big mall REIT other than GGP, did a SEC filing that it had retained a law firm (Wachtel, et al) and investment firm Lazard to explore acquiring some or all of GGP’s assets.  This creates a market for the malls owned by GGP, which will definitely help its valuation.  Part of the problem for GGP and other CRE companies the past 18 months has been an increasingly dreary commercial real esatate market as financing disappeared.  Just as with the derivatives market, when buyers disappear, the market value of the assets get marked down dramatically.   Now that there is a buyer on the horizon, I expect the GGP Board of Directors to work towards a sale of the properties at a price near the current market value.  Bill Ackman and Pershing Square Capital have a large equity stake in GGP and sit on the board.  It is Ackman’s job to realize value for his fund investors and will therefore likely work towards an exit strategy.   He needs a large buyer to absorb his 23% share and SPG looks like just that buyer.

3. And third, on Thursday this past week, mortgage holders / lenders on (170) of the mall properties that were in bankruptcy, agreed “in principle” to refinance $8.9B of the mortgages for GGP properties by extending maturities.  This agreement eliminates the pressure to liquidate those properties which were in technical default when many mortgages came due at a time late last year and earlier this year 2009) when there was no ability to refinance in a frozen credit market. 

All these are very positive situations and increased the value of GGP in some ways that are admittedly hard to measure at this point in time.  How much are GGP’s assets worth to Simon Properties?  Are they willing to pay a fair price based on cash flow (FFO) or do they think they can get a steal based on the depressed CRE market?  And how fast does the economy recover? 

For the reasons that the stock now seems fully valued with the balance sheet owners equity at $5 per share and a small premium now available due to the brighter  future prospects, I have liquidated all my position in GGP as of Monday, November 23.  Sure, the stock could even go higher.  It was near $60 in early 2007 and could be worth north of $20 if everything goes perfectly from here.  But best not to get greedy.  It was a very good ride while it lasted.

Is Reflation Policy Bullish for Gold? Unlikely

November 15th, 2009 Brian 3 comments

There is a simple fact that all Goldbugs miss: and that is the American economy, and most all others in the world, have just experienced a massive asset DEFLATION (still underway in some segments like commercial real estate). This deflation in America was about $15T over the past two years according to New York University’s Nouriel Roubini (from $40T to $25T). That asset deflation was completely psychological. One day American assets of all types were worth one value in dollars and just a little bit later, were worth quite a bit less. There was no massive physical destruction of assets as in a war (counter to the weak Weimar argument for hyperinfaltion), only economic.

The basis for my opinions on monetary reflation are derived from Hyman Minsky’s work. PIMCO’s Paul McCulley has written on “The Minsky Solution” many times the past two years. In early January, I featured one of McCulley’s articles in a post: http://wealth-ed.com/2009/01/reflation-economics-or-the-minsky-solution/

To deflate assets requires the value of the currency those assets are denominated in to increase as the quantity decreases (this might be counterintuivitive for most). In essence, $15T of dollars were destroyed or disappeared (not physically, but notionally with debt paper markdowns). Less dollar supply at a given demand = higher price / value. Central bankers everywhere understand this dynamic. So, in a coordinated way to restore stability to global assets, currencies are being expanded to replace those notionally destroyed through markdowns during 2008 (the paper that underpinned all those assets, CDOs, RMBS, etc).

The most intelligent dissertation I have seen on repairing a deflation was printed in Barrons last February. Ray Dalio, a rare Barrons contributor, was interviewed. I reference this interview on this blog: http://wealth-ed.com/2009/02/fixing-a-deflation-a-most-intelligent-analysis/

To recap what Dalio said, then, and most presciently: this CB driven monetary expansion is NOT inflationary to the extent that aggregate asset values are being returned to 2007 levels. “How can this be?”, say all the skeptics at this point.  My answer: by definition, the reduction of the value of $40T national assets to $25T assets is DEFLATIONARY. In America, $15T of the global reserve “currency” (almost all of it electronic bookkeeping and not “paper”) can be created to replace the “paper” that was lost in 2008, with mostly positive effects. There is no deleterious effect so long as the re-creation of the lost currency is done slowly enough as to not be disruptive to global currency flows (currency destruction in 2008 was disruptive enough, don’t we all agree?)

$80 Oil and $3 copper is probably in the area of “fair value” vs. the dollar given a mid 2007 USD reference. But $1100 Gold? Unlikely. Gold is now trading on speculative fear of inflation, not the reality of inflation itself. So far, the dollar has not even been expanded (reflated) sufficiently to move asset values back to mid-2007 (check local house prices). Monetary expansion is definitely not inflationary, in America, at this point in time. For gold to be worth $1100, let alone $1500, then global central banks must be unable to stop the expansion that has started in an effort to stabilize asset values. Maybe that is a reasonable speculation, and maybe not (and I own a prudent number of gold shares as a hedge, just in case it is). But like many others, as a more significant inflation hedge, I would rather take my chances with commodities that have fundamental industrial value, and not merely the psychic value of gold.  As is pointed out, gold is worth nothing unto itself. And worse, gold is not consumed, so supply forever increases. This ever-increasing supply dynamic is NOT the hallmark of a good investment.

Categories: Economics, Forecast

The Demise of Japan as Economic Power?

November 3rd, 2009 Brian No comments

In the Land of the Rising Sun, the financial sun is apparently setting. I have zero investments today in Japan for the reasons outlined in the story linked below. Credit Default Swaps (CDS) are showing the Japanese banks are under great stress. Those bank debt insurance policies are at levels close to where American banks were in September 2008 before the big crash and bank implosion.

I have business associates in Japan, and the economy has been in virtual depression for many years. They have a homeless problem like you would not believe with tent villages on public grounds in the cities, especially around the old castles (but being Japanese, they are very tidy tent villages).

From my take on the Japanese people, the problem is mostly to do with their domestic reluctance to consume. They have a domestic consumption economy much too small for the size of the country (by population). The older generation that came of age post WW2, was reluctant to spend on anything, understandably so given what they went through in the years after 1945. Even the business leaders who make a very nice income by American standards, are very frugal in how they live. The wages for the workers among the younger generations are very modest. I was able to determine that a sales person selling the same products as me, with the same skill set and experience, was making half the wage. The Japanese I know can’t believe how well we live here in America and some consider us wasteful and decadent (though they enjoy participating in the decadence when they visit).

And with the WW2 generation being very conservative about their own future, they had small families with birth rates below the “replacement rate” of about 2.2 children per family. This, along with virtually no immigration, leads to the well known problem of Japan’s gentrification. Who is going to take care of all the older people on government pension and healthcare?

And now Japan has lost the one thing that kept it going and growing the past 40-50 years: a leading global position in manufacture and export of consumer goods. China and its siblings (Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, etc) are taking over this role on the world stage. Japan is left to try and export capital goods and engineering know-how to China and siblings, much like America. But America has a population that always expands from immigration (a reason I am VERY pro-immigration) and an established consumer psychology that will recover within the next few years, Bill Gross’ proclamations to the contrary. Our desire to consume is genetic. It is the source of the proverbial “American Dream”.

A second significant problem for Japan is that Japan has no natural resources to export. So, they have lost their consumables export leadership and have nothing left to sell the rest of the world to drive their economy. Japan does not consume enough as a nation to fully utilize its own productive capacity for domestic demand and to keep its younger workers employed to pay for the retirements of the older workers. This is the source of Japanese deflation.

I think Japan will either evolve out of necessity into a consumer nation over the next 20 years as the younger generations with Western ideals take over management of the country, or Japan’s financial system will go into default. In October last year, the world financial system came to the rescue of America with its heavy importation of manufactured products and its reserve currency. The world had to save American banks in order to save itself. But for Japan, there will be no such salvation. Its banks will be allowed to fail and the Japanese people will have to build the country all over.

If Japan defaults, it will be VERY ugly (Iceland times 100). So, I expect global financial interests to push the Japanese to avoid that fate before it happens. Ironically, the Japanese need to spend their savings (those infamous Postal accounts). That is their one chance to save themselves and the rest of the planet a lot of pain. Strange as it seems for Americans with our low national savings rate, it is possible for a nation to be too thrifty (called “The Paradox of Thrift”). There is a need for balance in a sustainable economy: not too little savings, but not too much; not too little social security, but not too much (Obamacare for example); not too little immigration, and not too much. And so on.

Just be glad this is happening now and not in 1990. The Japanese economy (including real estate and stock market) has already deflated by 80%. The crash if it happens, will not be as precipitous from these levels as it could have been. But it is shocking to contemplate. I think the weakness of Japan’s economic system, its lack of domestic consumption and its long term social liabilitites, is the reason the Yen will never become the world reserve currency. The dollar remains safe in that role for some time to come.

Here is a link to the article that inspired this post published in the UK Telegraph on Sunday (bottom of post). It is somewhat frightening reading. But as mentioned, I don’t think the Japanese economy has a great deal of direct influence on the Rest of the World. Besides, as Warren Buffet says (quoting someone Ben Graham I believe), “Buy when everyone is Fearful and Sell when everyone is Greedy”. He did that today when he acquired ALL of Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail (BNI) for $44B.

“It is Japan We Should Be Worrying About, not America”