There has been much hand-wringing over Dubai and other countries and their sovereign debt problems since the end of November.  There is a fear that the exposure of this debt might be the tip of the iceberg.  It is feared that the government debt crisis will spread from the small and traditionally weak and underfunded economies of Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy and Ireland (the PIIGS) to the more substantial and traditionally strong economies of France, Germany, Japan and the United States bringing with it the fear of a global sovereign debt melt-down.  This opinion is emotional and uninformed

All the “sovereign debt default” talk about Dubai, Greece and Spain is old news that is just now getting press because what was already in motion at the top of the debt bubble in 2007 is finally coming to fruition.  Now that the commercial bank crisis has been for the most part averted, the sovereign debt issues that are closely related come to the fore. The Dubai problems were obvious two years ago or more. And Abu Dhabi and other UAE brethren have little patience for the profligacy of Dubai. They will backstop Dubai only after those who overextended get taken out. Then they will ride to the rescue and take control of many of the assets.

Same thing in Spain or Greece. Spain dug itself a deep hole by committing significant debt to aggressive expansion of public works, most notably the 3GW solar power expansion.  The EU will backstop those countries, but only at a price. It is in no one’s interest to let the fire burn out of control. I compare this to hot spots after a forest fire. If they don’t threaten to flare up and ignite new fires, you let them die out on their own.  Other times you douse them (with financial liquidity in this case) to put them out before they spread. If the infection spreads to Japan, that would be a much more serious event than Dubai, only because of the size of the Japanese economy and the relative importance of the yen. But I think the global central bank leaders have an eye on this and will prevent a Japanese economic collapse. As long as all major economies pull together, there is no reason to think we will have a financial calamity. Economic collapses require the public to panic (and stop spending). Panic is totally a psychological phenomena and can only be brought about by careless or reckless political actions (or inactions).

It is very important to note that the countries that are in danger of defaulting, are not key world economies. The talk of a major economic power like Germany, Japan or the USA being forced into insolvency is from someone ignorant of what it takes to force a financial default. Defaults don’t just happen, they are initiated by a creditor. If the debtor is large enough as compared to the creditor, then it is non-sensical or impossible for the creditor to force the default. The punishment will fall as much or more on the creditor as compared to the debtor. To force a smaller debtor to default, though, makes sense. Assets can be seized and held or resold to recoup the investment. Just who would force the USA, Germany or Japan into default? Who could gain? Who could manage the assets that were forfeited for the debt? There is no private money (hedge funds, ala John Paulsen) with the size to force a large sovereign to default.  China is the only creditor nation with the size to force such a default. But China won’t do it because it would be suicidal. China, the creditor, needs the developed world as much as the debtors need China and other developing, export-driven creditor nations. It is totally symbiotic, or co-dependent if one wants to be cynical about the situation.

To make my point about the relative size of creditors and debtors as it relates to default: I just made a good return recently on General Growth Properties (GGWPQ.pk) because I understood this dynamic. GGP was in technical default because of the financial crisis and its inability to roll forward short term debt taken on during the two to three years prior to the financial collapse. It was / is still cash flow positive and can cover the costs of its interest obligations, much like sovereigns with their ongoing ability to raise revenue from tax.  But GGP wisely had filed for bankruptcy as a single entity and had pulled all its various mall properties under the single corporate parent umbrella. This made GGP in effect, too big to fail. No single creditor had the legal power to force all the properties into a firesale. The court (Judge Gropper) saw it the same way and made the decision to force the parties to work out the mortgagtes (to refinance). When the creditors found out they were not going to be able to drive a hard bargain and take away the mortgaged property for much less than market value, they had to deal. Now GGP is close to exiting bankruptcy with all its property intact.

Even though sovereigns are unlikely to default in a cascading way, the global economy still remains weak.  It will take consumers and businesses a long time to regain their confidence to buy and bankers to lend.  For the overall American market, from this point on, the economy must improve significantly to get the SP500 much above 1200. But I think that is the higher probability over the next year or two as compared to a melt-down. Politically, I think President Obama is finding out that it isn’t prudent to be too anti-business. He seems to have finally gotten the point that the top priority is jobs. Health care and environment are lower priority since there is no money to pay for them if we don’t have near full employment and full tax revenues. We aren’t hearing too much health care talk from the Admin or Congress the past 2-3 weeks. To demonstrate his new-found love for business, Obama just had T-Sec Geithner spell out the capital gains tax freeze and investment tax credits for 2010. This will help jump start business and improve consumer sentiment as people start getting jobs.

As Obama and other world government leaders turn their attention towards restarting business, the world economy will heal and the markets will respond. Asian stock markets might be a little overdone just because of being the crowded trade, so I have backed off on them, for now. I have moved almost everything back to domestic large cap stocks or energy / commodities. I think 2010 will be a “consolidation” year with only a little index movement, maybe from 1100 to 1250. 2011 might be a similar year, with gradual improvement from 1250 to 1400. That would get us back to May 2008 which was about where the final dive started (down to 666). Maybe we pull back 100 points (10-12%) somewhere in the next 2-3 years. But by 2014 we can pass 1550 and set new highs, if the government continues to be supportive of business and doesn’t get too radical (seems more likely right now than 6 months ago).

I am buying up some of the banks that look like they are turning the corner and will be survivors. I have a bunch of the leveraged financial index, UYG, which is weighted towards the survivors like GS, JPM or WFC. But I also am buying some BAC now (as of two weeks ago). Even Citi might be a buy at this point, now that they have a plan to exit TARP. But I am passing on them for now.

Otherwise, my theme is Tech, commodities, energy and materials. Tech is due for a positive replacement / upgrade cycle after 10 years of being down.  Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows 7 should be the catalyst in 2010 once the IT budgets are approved. Just buy the XLK if you don’t have any favorites. SMH is the semicon index which has more beta than the XLK. My favorites in commodities tend to the miners and energy stocks, though I have recently picked up some Potash (POT).  I also have call options on (FCX) and (BHP).  This is a better way to play the weak dollar trade than gold, in my book, as operating leverage contributes to performance and generates cash flow which actually has value to an investor.  They have all outperformed Gold in 2009.  Commodities and Energy will benefit from the global economic expansion that is the natural reaction to the collapse. I find it interesting that Suncor (SU) was going up the last two days while oil futures are going down. I find that a very positive sign. I have really loaded up on Pennwest (PWE) and Provident Energy (PVX) .

There is a simple fact that all Goldbugs miss: and that is the American economy, and most all others in the world, have just experienced a massive asset DEFLATION (still underway in some segments like commercial real estate). This deflation in America was about $15T over the past two years according to New York University’s Nouriel Roubini (from $40T to $25T). That asset deflation was completely psychological. One day American assets of all types were worth one value in dollars and just a little bit later, were worth quite a bit less. There was no massive physical destruction of assets as in a war (counter to the weak Weimar argument for hyperinfaltion), only economic.

The basis for my opinions on monetary reflation are derived from Hyman Minsky’s work. PIMCO’s Paul McCulley has written on “The Minsky Solution” many times the past two years. In early January, I featured one of McCulley’s articles in a post: http://wealth-ed.com/2009/01/reflation-economics-or-the-minsky-solution/

To deflate assets requires the value of the currency those assets are denominated in to increase as the quantity decreases (this might be counterintuivitive for most). In essence, $15T of dollars were destroyed or disappeared (not physically, but notionally with debt paper markdowns). Less dollar supply at a given demand = higher price / value. Central bankers everywhere understand this dynamic. So, in a coordinated way to restore stability to global assets, currencies are being expanded to replace those notionally destroyed through markdowns during 2008 (the paper that underpinned all those assets, CDOs, RMBS, etc).

The most intelligent dissertation I have seen on repairing a deflation was printed in Barrons last February. Ray Dalio, a rare Barrons contributor, was interviewed. I reference this interview on this blog: http://wealth-ed.com/2009/02/fixing-a-deflation-a-most-intelligent-analysis/

To recap what Dalio said, then, and most presciently: this CB driven monetary expansion is NOT inflationary to the extent that aggregate asset values are being returned to 2007 levels. “How can this be?”, say all the skeptics at this point.  My answer: by definition, the reduction of the value of $40T national assets to $25T assets is DEFLATIONARY. In America, $15T of the global reserve “currency” (almost all of it electronic bookkeeping and not “paper”) can be created to replace the “paper” that was lost in 2008, with mostly positive effects. There is no deleterious effect so long as the re-creation of the lost currency is done slowly enough as to not be disruptive to global currency flows (currency destruction in 2008 was disruptive enough, don’t we all agree?)

$80 Oil and $3 copper is probably in the area of “fair value” vs. the dollar given a mid 2007 USD reference. But $1100 Gold? Unlikely. Gold is now trading on speculative fear of inflation, not the reality of inflation itself. So far, the dollar has not even been expanded (reflated) sufficiently to move asset values back to mid-2007 (check local house prices). Monetary expansion is definitely not inflationary, in America, at this point in time. For gold to be worth $1100, let alone $1500, then global central banks must be unable to stop the expansion that has started in an effort to stabilize asset values. Maybe that is a reasonable speculation, and maybe not (and I own a prudent number of gold shares as a hedge, just in case it is). But like many others, as a more significant inflation hedge, I would rather take my chances with commodities that have fundamental industrial value, and not merely the psychic value of gold.  As is pointed out, gold is worth nothing unto itself. And worse, gold is not consumed, so supply forever increases. This ever-increasing supply dynamic is NOT the hallmark of a good investment.

In the Land of the Rising Sun, the financial sun is apparently setting. I have zero investments today in Japan for the reasons outlined in the story linked below. Credit Default Swaps (CDS) are showing the Japanese banks are under great stress. Those bank debt insurance policies are at levels close to where American banks were in September 2008 before the big crash and bank implosion.

I have business associates in Japan, and the economy has been in virtual depression for many years. They have a homeless problem like you would not believe with tent villages on public grounds in the cities, especially around the old castles (but being Japanese, they are very tidy tent villages).

From my take on the Japanese people, the problem is mostly to do with their domestic reluctance to consume. They have a domestic consumption economy much too small for the size of the country (by population). The older generation that came of age post WW2, was reluctant to spend on anything, understandably so given what they went through in the years after 1945. Even the business leaders who make a very nice income by American standards, are very frugal in how they live. The wages for the workers among the younger generations are very modest. I was able to determine that a sales person selling the same products as me, with the same skill set and experience, was making half the wage. The Japanese I know can’t believe how well we live here in America and some consider us wasteful and decadent (though they enjoy participating in the decadence when they visit).

And with the WW2 generation being very conservative about their own future, they had small families with birth rates below the “replacement rate” of about 2.2 children per family. This, along with virtually no immigration, leads to the well known problem of Japan’s gentrification. Who is going to take care of all the older people on government pension and healthcare?

And now Japan has lost the one thing that kept it going and growing the past 40-50 years: a leading global position in manufacture and export of consumer goods. China and its siblings (Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, etc) are taking over this role on the world stage. Japan is left to try and export capital goods and engineering know-how to China and siblings, much like America. But America has a population that always expands from immigration (a reason I am VERY pro-immigration) and an established consumer psychology that will recover within the next few years, Bill Gross’ proclamations to the contrary. Our desire to consume is genetic. It is the source of the proverbial “American Dream”.

A second significant problem for Japan is that Japan has no natural resources to export. So, they have lost their consumables export leadership and have nothing left to sell the rest of the world to drive their economy. Japan does not consume enough as a nation to fully utilize its own productive capacity for domestic demand and to keep its younger workers employed to pay for the retirements of the older workers. This is the source of Japanese deflation.

I think Japan will either evolve out of necessity into a consumer nation over the next 20 years as the younger generations with Western ideals take over management of the country, or Japan’s financial system will go into default. In October last year, the world financial system came to the rescue of America with its heavy importation of manufactured products and its reserve currency. The world had to save American banks in order to save itself. But for Japan, there will be no such salvation. Its banks will be allowed to fail and the Japanese people will have to build the country all over.

If Japan defaults, it will be VERY ugly (Iceland times 100). So, I expect global financial interests to push the Japanese to avoid that fate before it happens. Ironically, the Japanese need to spend their savings (those infamous Postal accounts). That is their one chance to save themselves and the rest of the planet a lot of pain. Strange as it seems for Americans with our low national savings rate, it is possible for a nation to be too thrifty (called “The Paradox of Thrift”). There is a need for balance in a sustainable economy: not too little savings, but not too much; not too little social security, but not too much (Obamacare for example); not too little immigration, and not too much. And so on.

Just be glad this is happening now and not in 1990. The Japanese economy (including real estate and stock market) has already deflated by 80%. The crash if it happens, will not be as precipitous from these levels as it could have been. But it is shocking to contemplate. I think the weakness of Japan’s economic system, its lack of domestic consumption and its long term social liabilitites, is the reason the Yen will never become the world reserve currency. The dollar remains safe in that role for some time to come.

Here is a link to the article that inspired this post published in the UK Telegraph on Sunday (bottom of post). It is somewhat frightening reading. But as mentioned, I don’t think the Japanese economy has a great deal of direct influence on the Rest of the World. Besides, as Warren Buffet says (quoting someone Ben Graham I believe), “Buy when everyone is Fearful and Sell when everyone is Greedy”. He did that today when he acquired ALL of Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail (BNI) for $44B.

“It is Japan We Should Be Worrying About, not America”

Nirav at “LivingOffDividends” just gave me some more grist for my opinion mill.  I hope he doesn’t mind being my debatee in the Socratic tradition. 

“LOD” is somewhat Goldbuggish, which is not a scathing criticism.  LOD does a great job of exploring various classes of investing and living life.  The overall theme and site moniker is an outstanding recommendation.   But, while I think gold is a terrific financial asset and has its place in just about any portfolio, one must be careful to advise that people flee to gold because of the prospect of inflation / deflation or everything in between.  Gold has lost people a lot of money over the ages.  It is a store of wealth, but not much of an investment as it does not grow, or help a business grow.  It just sits there like a pretty lump.

Here is the LivingOffDividends post and my rebuttal:

Insurance Company Buys $400 Million in Gold

I just can’t let this one pass without a challenge. Sure, money supply has exploded at the Federal level. But it has done so by deliberate effort to replace the value of assets destroyed by the financial crisis and real estate panic. I think a healthy way to look at this is as a transfer of the financial bubble from weak hands to strong hands that can absorb and dissipate the bubble. By the way, this is the same financial bubble that has been traveling through the American economy since the early 1980s, if not before. The private sector seems to be unable to deal with the hot potatoe, so it had to end up in public hands at this point. But as you say, the wealth will gradually be transferred by the Feds back to the private sector over the next 5-10 years.

Once money is created, it cannot be destroyed. It is similar to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and the Conservation of Energy. That theory everyone knows as E=M*c squared. Mass can be transmuted to energy, but it always will exist in one or another form. Money (wealth)  is not only preserved over all of time once created, but can be  increased by the productive enterprise of humans.  Once created, it can be transferred and transmuted into different forms of assets, but it cannot be destroyed (call this “Brian’s Theory of Monetary Conservancy”).

Consider the history of great civilizations that have risen and fallen.  The political structure of those civilizations has ceased and political power has disappeared in the Greek Empire, the Roman Empire (Italy), the Spanish Empire, the British Empire and the Chinese Dynasties.  But the wealth created by those political systems has lived on and been passed down over the generations.  Even World Wars have proven unable to destroy wealth, as inconceivable as this seems.

I wrote about this idea on my blog back on May 4th. http://wealth-ed.com/2009/05/04/gmo-and-the-persistence-of-stock-market-returns/

I quoted one of the true financial experts of our time, Jeremy Grantham regarding the phenomenon of indestructible wealth:

“The Great Depression is far and away the most striking period on the chart (see linked article for charts). Real GDP fell by 25% from 1929 to 1933, in what was easily the worst economic event to hit the U.S. since the Civil War. But that fall, as extraordinary as it was, was a fall in demand relative to potential GDP, not a fall in the economy’s productive capacity, and so the economy eventually (by 1945) got back onto its previous growth trend as if the Depression had never happened.”

So, while it is very interesting that a life insurance company has decided to buy some gold to diversify its assets (I am sure a very small percent of its total managed assets), there is nothing about this that should indicate anything significant about gold for the future. Gold is just another class of asset. That is all. It has no special place as compared to other real assets, and it may be less important or significant than assets which have some productive use, like copper or oil.

I also refute the assertion that gold has a use as an asset offering protection when an economy is “weakening”. Gold has some short term panic value, as it did last fall. But if it didn’t shoot to $2500 an ounce during the worst financial crisis since 1930, then it probably is not even good as an insurance policy during a crisis.

The statement: “CEO Zore believes that the price of gold could double “or even rise fivefold” if the economy continues to weaken.”, just tells me that Mr. Zore should not be running a major insurance company. That statement is shear stupidity and shows a lack of financial understanding. Gold might increase by five-fold if the dollar weakens to 20% of its current value. But that is the only way this scenario will play out. For the dollar to weaken in that way, the economy would have to be going strong. We just saw that the dollar STRENGTHENS as a global safety trade when the economy tanks.

Yes, gold will appreciate while the dollar depreciates.  It is a fiat currency alternative. That is a given. But while people have been watching gold trade between $900 and $1000 the past 3 months, oil has gone from $30 to $70. So which asset has more potential to protect against inflation while providing investment opportunities?