Hey everyone, Jared here, I just wanted to take a minute to explain to everyone how important it is to always check your credit score. The other day I ordered my credit score since this past year has been pretty rough for me and I wanted to see where I was sitting. Much to my surprise and dismay, I found that my credit had been hurt by a bunch of fraudulent charges on credit cards that were taken out under my name but were never in my possession. Luckily this happened pretty recently so I was able to fix the problem before it did any serious damage. If you would like to view your credit score there are many ways to go about it, but I have found that creditscorequick.com is a great way to get your full, accurate score for a reasonable price. Don't let identity theft happen to you, with the economy the way it is right now, the last thing anyone needs is to be a victim of identity theft.

Great Earnings this morning (Tuesday, October 20) from CAT, UTX, PFE and KO. CAT guidance was the economy is improving much faster than expected and the risk of a double dip recession is now "very low" in 2010. CAT (a proxy for the export driven, industrial equipment market) beat earnings estimates by 85% and had higher revenues than forecast (which is supposedly what the market is begging for). So, what happened to its stock price? Sold off.

This earnings season has become the typical denial event by the Bears. The hardcore bear traders try and sell down every rally and discount any good news as either lies or misinterpretation. They first criticize the weakness of economic growth and unemployment levels, and then turn around and criticize the Fed for using accomodative policy to ramp back up the economy.  (Earth to Bears: you can't have it both ways, unless Armageddon is your objective, in which case, tight policy will deliver the economic disaster you are awaiting)

This market is still climbing a huge "wall of worry" and so it will continue climbing higher (until all the Bears throw in the towel). When I stop seeing Michael Pento, David Rosenberg , Peter Schiff, Joe Battapaglia, etc on CNBC blasting the Fed and the market, that is when I will Sell.  There is no Euphoria.  There are no "rose-colored glasses.  There are only Bears (likely still short since SP500 of 666) begging for their wishes to be fulfilled.  Please keep ripping the market and economy.  It is making me wealthy.

Today, I was able to roll my October FLRs that were exercised on Friday to November sold puts, and picked up another 0.50 per contract in the process. I also flipped my BHP for a 2.47 gain the past 12 days (closed my Nov 70 puts at 1.75 and opened same number of Nov 75 puts at 4.50 a few minutes later) during the morning sell off. I am now waiting to get back into EWZ as Brazil sold off big today (down to 70 from 76). I will wait for $67 to get back in with some DITM calls on Mar 2010.

I also doubled down on my GE Mar 2010 Calls ($10s) at $5.80. They had been almost $7 a few days ago. Now I have 10 contracts (1000 shares) plus another 500 shares of GE.

There are many doomsayers on the economy and markets. They all say roughly the same thing: we have been profligate as a nation and as a world, and there is a big price to pay. This price will be paid in the form of a very long period of economic stagnation and declining markets. The doomsayers give many seemingly sound reasons for their outlook, that to some may seem irrefutable evidence of a coming economic armageddon.

Unfortunately, history does not support their thesis. If anything, what economic history proves is that there is a wired-in persistence of growth in the economy. When we look at our financial surroundings on a day to day basis, we get confused by the noise. Daily, monthly, even quarterly data might seem to indicate some watershed change in the economic future. But the facts show us that year after year, decade after decade, the economy continues to grow very evenly and consistently. The markets will mirror this growth in the long term, and once all the daily noise is removed.

Here is a chart I prepared showing this persistence. It dates from the earliest Gross National Product data available on the government economic data website. It shows that even the 1930s disaster looks relatively benign in an 80 year perspective.

The conclusion: invest for the future, not the next day. And you will be richly rewarded for your patience.

Financial markets are driven by forward looking data and the anticipation of what is to come. This is true in both directions: down and up. Markets are now suggesting that there is much good news to come, as they drive higher and higher.

We are at the door in two of the major world markets: the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite. The S&P500 finished the day Friday at 986 and is trading right at a key barrier at 1002.63 at the close on Monday, August 03. The NASDAQ Composite last traded at 1975 on Friday and is now at 2008.61 at the close, Monday.

What is leading the markets higher given the terrible levels of unemployment and recent weak economic growth in America? The markets discount the future by at least 6 months, and up to a year in times of economic clarity. What the markets see today is a much better economic landscape in the middle of 2010.

Economic stimulus of all forms is beginning to take hold. It is unfortunate there is such a lag between the time stimulus is authorized and the time it is implemented, but such is the nature of big government. Very important too, is that the banking industry has been secured. This has stopped the unwinding of credit through the firesale-selling of credit securities.

By the middle of 2010, banks and bank-like businesses (GE, GMAC, insurance cos., et al) should begin reducing their reserves against potential loan and derivative losses. The recapture of those reserves go straight to the bottom line and will fire up corporate earnings in the financial sector for several years to come. Improved earnings in the financial sector will result in somewhat easier lending standards (though not for a long time as easy as 2005). Freer lending will result in formation of new capital and expansion of industry and business. This expansion will require new employees which will reduce unemployment. Reduced unemployment will result in higher levels of consumption.

Thus begins the virtuous cycle of economic recovery. Jim Paulsen today (Monday, August 3) on CNBC made a similar case for recovery. He also talked about a potential "gap up" once the psychological barriers of SP500 at 1000 and NPQ Composite at 2000 are cleared convincingly (perhaps with the next week).  Such a gap up would begin with a next day open substantially higher than the prvevious day's close.    This happens as investors who were committed to being Bearish (who were drinking the Roubini Koolaid), change camps overnight and become reluctant Bulls.  This instant switch of sides can have dramatic effects on a market.  Paulsen thinks a 30% pop (from 1000 to 1300 in the SP500) is not out of the question.  He did not provide a time frame for this event, but it is probably by year end.

None of this is to say that there will not be pullbacks and corrections along the way. There will be. And one can be expected before year end during this potential "melt up".  There are still a lot of problems in the economy to be resolved. At times, the market will step back and see those problems, and worry once again if those problems might not thwart the recovery. And then the markets will sell off. But such pullbacks will provide new opportunities for investment and will be cut short within 4 to 6 weeks. 

Recovery is in the air.

Get cautiously long all the markets and be prepared to stop out short positions if the market gaps up.

Reflation. It is a very provocative concept. We all know what is meant by the term Inflation. It is almost intuitive because we have lived with it all of our lives. Those of us over 40 have a special affection with that word as we experienced the 1970s and some of the worst that inflation can bring.

But few of us have a good idea what is meant by the term reflation. Whether we should embrace or fear it. My way of looking at reflation is to "fill the hole" left by the deflation caused by housing, stock market and other financial asset price contraction. All that asset value had to go somewhere. The assets underlying value didn't just disappear, though much of the derivative paper might have.  Assets were revalued by a mass panic of the entire American and global population. But this was a psychological phenomonon, and so it can be reversed.  It is quite possible for assets to regain their previous value with some encouragement.  That encouragement comes in the form of reflation and what it encourages: the "animal spirits" of the market place.  Until we find asset price recovery through the process of reflation, diminished values will wreak havoc on the economy through slashed consumption, falling corporate and tax revenues, declining profits and higher unemployment.

Reflation is made possible by the expansion of the monetary supply, offsetting money supply reduction that occurs from asset price contraction. But it is an indirect offset. If my house was worth $600,000 in 2007 and is now worth $400,000 in July 2009, to reflate the economy the government doesn't just send me a check for $200,000 (though a case can be made for doing just this ala "Helicopter Ben"). Rather, monetary expansion trickles through the economy: first to bolster the banking system where it originates from programs like TARP and TALF, then through Federal "stimulus programs" that eventually (belatedly?) result in a "Cash for Clunkers" program, and finally to home owners through firming home prices and higher wages with economic expansion and increasing demand; all from the proverbial "thawing" of a frozen credit system enabled by backstopping the banking system.

But reflation comes with a price, and it is political, not numerical. Because reflation originates within the Federal government (the Federal Reserve Banking system and the Treasury), the only entity which can legally create money from nothing, it comes with plenty of strings attached. Those strings will be pulled by the majority political power, Democrats at this point in time. The party in power will seek to use economic reflation policy to achieve social policy and, in the case of liberals, a redistribution of wealth. Whether one agrees or disagrees with a specific policy or program,  it is beside the point. The point: because there are strings attached, reflation through fiscal policy or monetary means there are conditions that are inefficient and carry plenty of future baggage (entitlements).

Bill Gross wrote about our economic reflation policies and what it means for our economic future. In his eyes, the future is none too optimistic. Bill Gross suggests we are doomed to many years, perhaps decades, of below trend economic growth, his "new normal". Those of us less than 70 years old, who did not experience life during the 1930s and 40s, will probably need to recalibrate our expectations.

I personally take exception to the characterization of 3% Nominal GDP growth, as Bill Gross forecasts, as being a "New Normal".  Such a growth rate is an aberration and would mean perpetual recession. It is actually an old normal at a time of zero or negative inflation, like right now when Nominal GDP equals Real GDP.  Rather, 3% "real" growth in a mature economy like the American, is an "old normal"; more like the economy of the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s, on average. In fact, the Real GDP expanded by an average of 3.45% between 1951 and 2004. It is important to look at "REAL" data as it strips out the effect of inflation, which was pronounced during the latter half of that range.

In Bill Gross' words:

Reflating nominal GDP by inflating asset prices is the fundamental, yet infrequently acknowledged, goal of policymakers. If they can do that, then employment and economic stability may ultimately follow.

Gross goes on to make the point that we can't expect to see 5% Nominal GDP growth as we did in old normal times.  But his point doesn't make much sense as it was actually much higher on average in the past 50 years.  Even at face value, his statement begs the question "what part of that nominal GDP  will be inflation?"

I expect we will actually see moderate inflation once reflation has been achieved.  It is the natural result of successfully reflating the economy and having it run at productive capacity and full employment all while running a Federal fiscal deficit to fnance reflation policy. Because full employment (around 95% of the workage population) is a Federal policy goal, and because the Feds have the means to control reflation (monetary expansion), I expect this goal to be successfully met.  So, we can therefore expect moderate inflation once stability is achieved.

Bill Gross concludes his August 2009 newsletter by making the case for 3% Nominal GDP for the forseeable future:

A 3% nominal GDP “new normal” means lower profit growth, permanently higher unemployment, capped consumer spending growth rates and an increasing involvement of the government sector, which substantially changes the character of the American capitalistic model. High risk bonds, commercial real estate, and even lower quality municipal bonds may suffer more than cyclical defaults if not government supported. Stock P/Es will rest at lower historical norms, and higher stock prices will ultimately depend on tangible earnings growth in the form of increased dividends, not green shoots hope. An investor should remember that a journey to 3% nominal GDP means default/haircuts for assets on the upper end of the risk spectrum, as well as extremely low yielding returns for government and government-guaranteed assets at the bottom end.

Yes, I suppose a 3% Nominal GDP would have the effects described if it were possible.  But the PIMCO scenario is highly unlikely and Gross' reasoning is flawed in many ways.  If we are  indeed in a period of lower interest rates, then P/Es will not contract but will likely expand.  P/Es run inverse to the Treasury Yield Curve, the infamous Greenspan "Treasury discount model".    So, low interest rates should result in higher stock prices once stability returns to the economy.  However, I believe we will see higher interest rates once the economy is reflated and the economy stabilized.  This will result in attenuated economic growth of around 2-3% Real GDP, plus an inflation rate of 5% which will cause Nominal GDP to run above 7% as opposed to the 3% forecast by Bill Gross.  American Nominal GDP ran between 7 to 13% during the late 1970s, a period of anemic economic growth (real), large fiscal deficits and moderate to high inflation.  Even in 1981, during a severe recession, nominal GDP grew by 4.4% due to the high embedded inflation.

Like Gross, I do worry that the "strings attached" to reflation policy will "substantially change the character of the American capitalistic model".  But political pressure from the right should counter the most extreme of what the left has to offer.  We already see evidence of this in respect to nationalized medicine and "cap and trade".  So, even this concern of Gross' is overblown.  Another threat comes from foreign interests who might not want to help America reflate by continuing to buy Treasury bond issues that support monetary expansion / quantitative easing.  But I think these foreign entities (China, India, Oil Nations, etc) see that it is their own self-interest to reflate the American economy and rekindle its consumer sentiments.

I think Mr. Gross has fallen prey to his shifted paradigm of a "New Normal". His position does not take into account the resultant moderate inflation that must naturally  follows a reflationary policy.  We can expect inflation in 2012 and after of perhaps 5 to 7%. This will result in a Real GDP that is negative if we sutract inflation from the Nominal GDP forecast of 3% suggested by Mr. Gross. Zero or negative Real GDP is not consistent with full employment and will not be tolerated by our political process.  So it cannot happen for an extended period of time invalidating the PIMCO argument. I suggest the PIMCO triumverate re-examine their assumptions.

Bill Gross August 2009 Investment Newsletter