Archive

Posts Tagged ‘pvx’

Will Sovereign Debt Downgrades Sink the Global Economy?

December 11th, 2009 Brian 6 comments

There has been much hand-wringing over Dubai and other countries and their sovereign debt problems since the end of November.  There is a fear that the exposure of this debt might be the tip of the iceberg.  It is feared that the government debt crisis will spread from the small and traditionally weak and underfunded economies of Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy and Ireland (the PIIGS) to the more substantial and traditionally strong economies of France, Germany, Japan and the United States bringing with it the fear of a global sovereign debt melt-down.  This opinion is emotional and uninformed

All the "sovereign debt default" talk about Dubai, Greece and Spain is old news that is just now getting press because what was already in motion at the top of the debt bubble in 2007 is finally coming to fruition.  Now that the commercial bank crisis has been for the most part averted, the sovereign debt issues that are closely related come to the fore. The Dubai problems were obvious two years ago or more. And Abu Dhabi and other UAE brethren have little patience for the of Dubai. They will backstop Dubai only after those who overextended get taken out. Then they will ride to the rescue and take control of many of the assets.

Same thing in Spain or Greece. Spain dug itself a deep hole by committing significant debt to aggressive expansion of public works, most notably the 3GW solar power expansion.  The EU will backstop those countries, but only at a price. It is in no one's interest to let the fire burn out of control. I compare this to hot spots after a forest fire. If they don't threaten to flare up and ignite new fires, you let them die out on their own.  Other times you douse them (with financial liquidity in this case) to put them out before they spread. If the infection spreads to Japan, that would be a much more serious event than Dubai, only because of the size of the Japanese economy and the relative importance of the yen. But I think the global central bank leaders have an eye on this and will prevent a Japanese economic collapse. As long as all major economies pull together, there is no reason to think we will have a financial calamity. Economic collapses require the public to panic (and stop spending). Panic is totally a psychological phenomena and can only be brought about by careless or reckless political actions (or inactions).

It is very important to note that the countries that are in danger of defaulting, are not key world economies. The talk of a major economic power like Germany, Japan or the USA being forced into insolvency is from someone ignorant of what it takes to force a financial default. Defaults don't just happen, they are initiated by a creditor. If the debtor is large enough as compared to the creditor, then it is non-sensical or impossible for the creditor to force the default. The punishment will fall as much or more on the creditor as compared to the debtor. To force a smaller debtor to default, though, makes sense. Assets can be seized and held or resold to recoup the investment. Just who would force the USA, Germany or Japan into default? Who could gain? Who could manage the assets that were forfeited for the debt? There is no private money (hedge funds, ala John Paulsen) with the size to force a large sovereign to default.  China is the only creditor nation with the size to force such a default. But China won't do it because it would be suicidal. China, the creditor, needs the developed world as much as the debtors need China and other developing, export-driven creditor nations. It is totally symbiotic, or co-dependent if one wants to be cynical about the situation.

To make my point about the relative size of creditors and debtors as it relates to default: I just made a good return recently on General Growth Properties (GGWPQ.pk) because I understood this dynamic. GGP was in technical default because of the financial crisis and its inability to roll forward short term debt taken on during the two to three years prior to the financial collapse. It was / is still cash flow positive and can cover the costs of its interest obligations, much like sovereigns with their ongoing ability to raise revenue from tax.  But GGP wisely had filed for bankruptcy as a single entity and had pulled all its various mall properties under the single corporate parent umbrella. This made GGP in effect, too big to fail. No single creditor had the legal power to force all the properties into a firesale. The court (Judge Gropper) saw it the same way and made the decision to force the parties to work out the mortgagtes (to refinance). When the creditors found out they were not going to be able to drive a hard bargain and take away the mortgaged property for much less than market value, they had to deal. Now GGP is close to exiting bankruptcy with all its property intact.

Even though sovereigns are unlikely to default in a cascading way, the still remains weak.  It will take consumers and businesses a long time to regain their confidence to buy and bankers to lend.  For the overall American market, from this point on, the economy must improve significantly to get the SP500 much above 1200. But I think that is the higher probability over the next year or two as compared to a melt-down. Politically, I think President Obama is finding out that it isn't prudent to be too anti-business. He seems to have finally gotten the point that the top priority is jobs. Health care and environment are lower priority since there is no money to pay for them if we don't have near full employment and full tax revenues. We aren't hearing too much health care talk from the Admin or Congress the past 2-3 weeks. To demonstrate his new-found love for business, Obama just had T-Sec Geithner spell out the capital gains tax freeze and investment tax credits for 2010. This will help jump start business and improve consumer sentiment as people start getting jobs.

As Obama and other world government leaders turn their attention towards restarting business, the world economy will heal and the markets will respond. Asian stock markets might be a little overdone just because of being the crowded trade, so I have backed off on them, for now. I have moved almost everything back to domestic large cap stocks or energy / commodities. I think 2010 will be a "consolidation" year with only a little index movement, maybe from 1100 to 1250. 2011 might be a similar year, with gradual improvement from 1250 to 1400. That would get us back to May 2008 which was about where the final dive started (down to 666). Maybe we pull back 100 points (10-12%) somewhere in the next 2-3 years. But by 2014 we can pass 1550 and set new highs, if the government continues to be supportive of business and doesn't get too radical (seems more likely right now than 6 months ago).

I am buying up some of the banks that look like they are turning the corner and will be survivors. I have a bunch of the leveraged financial index, UYG, which is weighted towards the survivors like GS, JPM or WFC. But I also am buying some BAC now (as of two weeks ago). Even Citi might be a buy at this point, now that they have a plan to exit TARP. But I am passing on them for now.

Otherwise, my theme is Tech, commodities, energy and materials. Tech is due for a positive replacement / upgrade cycle after 10 years of being down.  Microsoft's (MSFT) Windows 7 should be the catalyst in 2010 once the IT budgets are approved. Just buy the XLK if you don't have any favorites. SMH is the semicon index which has more beta than the XLK. My favorites in commodities tend to the miners and energy stocks, though I have recently picked up some Potash (POT).  I also have call options on (FCX) and (BHP).  This is a better way to play the weak dollar trade than gold, in my book, as operating leverage contributes to performance and generates cash flow which actually has value to an investor.  They have all outperformed Gold in 2009.  Commodities and Energy will benefit from the global economic expansion that is the natural reaction to the collapse. I find it interesting that Suncor (SU) was going up the last two days while oil futures are going down. I find that a very positive sign. I have really loaded up on Pennwest (PWE) and Provident Energy (PVX) .

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Economics, Forecast

Natural Gas: It’s Time has Arrived

September 22nd, 2009 Brian No comments

I am a long term fan of and have posted pro-nat gas articles on this website in the past. It is weak now due to its "junk energy" status during an economic downturn. It is highly leveraged to the economy and does very well in a strong economy and very poorly in a weak economy. This is due to its primary use as an industrial energy supply and its seasonal use for building heating.

If (when) nat gas becomes a primary transportation fuel source alongside gasoline and diesel, its utility and value will soar. I think that time is coming soon. The easiest way to achieve a significant global reduction in green-house gas is by a conversion of transportation systems from gasoline to nat gas and electric power from coal to nat gas. This hasn't happened in the past for two reasons: (1) lack of distribution infrastructure (i.e. nat gas fuel stations on every corner); and (2) perception of uneven supply across the geography (nat gas is expensive to transport other than through a pipeline due to its low density as a gas). A third issue is the cost of the conversion of vehicles from gasoline to nat gas powered, but this is a manageable economic issue that can be addressed with tax policy, and is not a technology issue.

I see the Obama administration addressing the greenhouse gas problem through policies that favor nat gas. He will announce the framework of those policies today (Tuesday). Nat Gas is a good solution to provide energy independence and a cleaner environment. It provides a technology bridge to developing renewable energy sources like solar and hydrogen fuel cells. It will happen and should be the cornerstone of every portfolio.

The nat gas ETF, UNG, is flawed, but is the only pure play on nat gas pricing. The premium in the ETF due to a moratorium on adding futures to the ETF is down from 20% to 5%. That premium is manageable and makes UNG once again a decent way to play nat gas. North America energy producers are the other way to play nat gas: CHK, XTO, LINN, PWE, PVX, MRO, PGH are some of the stocks one can use to gain exposure to nat gas.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Uncategorized

PWE vs. XOM: Followup

August 1st, 2008 Brian No comments

A few days ago I wrote Jake Schmidt about what I saw was the problem with the large integrated oil companies like Exxon (), Conoco (COP) and Chevron (CVX). Namely, the integrated oils are saddled with both diminishing reserves in more politically dangerous and expensive locations, and alternately, generate much of their income from refining and retail operations which have been squeezed by tight crude supplies and decreasing crack spreads.

This week's earning news has backed up that assertion as on Thursday and CVX today, have disappointed the Street and have been sold off as a result. I had suggested that instead, we should just buy more Pennwest (PWE) or other favorite Canroys. They continue to be a great bargain as shown by the yield and cash flow multiples. Or, if a little more leverage and return is desired, sell the puts short.

Today (August 1), the PWE September $30 put (PWEUF) has a premium of $1.65. This generates a return of over 5% on the premium, but with the leverage of a margined short put (20% margin), the actual return is over 25%. When the 42 days to expiration is annualized, that simple return is around 250%. High return, high risk, so what is the risk? Getting PWE assigned at $30 a share if the price drops further before expiration on September 20. That PWE stock price is based on the cash flow generated by an average crude oil price of $80 a barrel, with the PWE hedge program that is in place. What is the risk of oil going below $80 in the next 12 or 24 months? I think pretty low. And if the stock is "put" to you the option seller, it is returning 12% on dividend yield right now, while retaining almost 50% of its cash flow for reinvestment and acquisition.

I continue to think the Canroys are the way to play the energy market. If not PWE, take a look at Daylight (DAYYF), Harvest Energy (HTE), Provident (PVX), Baytex (BTE), or Pengrowth (PGH).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Categories: Uncategorized