Archive

Posts Tagged ‘PWE’

Oil Will Continue to Move Higher To $100

April 9th, 2010 Brian 4 comments

Oil continues higher towards $100 by July. It pulled back on the mini-panic yesterday morning, from $87 to $84. But the bottom for now seems to be at $80. Short of any major , the price must go higher. Demand is only increasing around the world.

The data show that the use of oil per capita in America is over 25 bbls per year. In the growing economies of Asia (India, China, etc) and Latin America (Brazil) where 2/3 of the world population lives, the per capita use is less than 2 bbls. As those economies "Westernize" their population will require more oil. Even if the developing world only gets to 10 bbls per capita in the next 20 years, where will all that oil come from. A quick estimate will be a requirement to more than double current world production of around 85 mm barrels per day. That is just not possible. There isn't that much more oil to find. Oil companies today have a hard time just finding enough oil to replace the depletion of older wells.

Price is what must give. The only way to balance is through higher prices that bring down Western demand.

Today, I bought additional PennWest (PWE), using the July $20 Call and Put Options. I sold the July $20 puts for $0.55 to pay the time premium on the July $20 calls which cost $1.75 with PWE trading today at $21.45. $20 is the new floor for PWE with 2006 price of $30 being the new target price.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Energy stocks, Options

Will Sovereign Debt Downgrades Sink the Global Economy?

December 11th, 2009 Brian 6 comments

There has been much hand-wringing over Dubai and other countries and their sovereign debt problems since the end of November.  There is a fear that the exposure of this debt might be the tip of the iceberg.  It is feared that the government debt crisis will spread from the small and traditionally weak and underfunded economies of Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy and Ireland (the PIIGS) to the more substantial and traditionally strong economies of France, Germany, Japan and the United States bringing with it the fear of a global sovereign debt melt-down.  This opinion is emotional and uninformed

All the "sovereign " talk about Dubai, Greece and Spain is old news that is just now getting press because what was already in motion at the top of the debt bubble in 2007 is finally coming to fruition.  Now that the commercial bank crisis has been for the most part averted, the sovereign debt issues that are closely related come to the fore. The Dubai problems were obvious two years ago or more. And Abu Dhabi and other UAE brethren have little patience for the profligacy of Dubai. They will backstop Dubai only after those who overextended get taken out. Then they will ride to the rescue and take control of many of the assets.

Same thing in Spain or Greece. Spain dug itself a deep hole by committing significant debt to aggressive expansion of public works, most notably the 3GW solar power expansion.  The EU will backstop those countries, but only at a price. It is in no one's interest to let the fire burn out of control. I compare this to hot spots after a forest fire. If they don't threaten to flare up and ignite new fires, you let them die out on their own.  Other times you douse them (with financial liquidity in this case) to put them out before they spread. If the infection spreads to Japan, that would be a much more serious event than Dubai, only because of the size of the Japanese economy and the relative importance of the yen. But I think the global central bank leaders have an eye on this and will prevent a Japanese economic collapse. As long as all major economies pull together, there is no reason to think we will have a financial calamity. Economic collapses require the public to panic (and stop spending). Panic is totally a psychological phenomena and can only be brought about by careless or reckless political actions (or inactions).

It is very important to note that the countries that are in danger of defaulting, are not key world economies. The talk of a major economic power like Germany, Japan or the USA being forced into insolvency is from someone ignorant of what it takes to force a financial default. Defaults don't just happen, they are initiated by a creditor. If the debtor is large enough as compared to the creditor, then it is non-sensical or impossible for the creditor to force the default. The punishment will fall as much or more on the creditor as compared to the debtor. To force a smaller debtor to default, though, makes sense. Assets can be seized and held or resold to recoup the investment. Just who would force the USA, Germany or Japan into default? Who could gain? Who could manage the assets that were forfeited for the debt? There is no private money (hedge funds, ala John Paulsen) with the size to force a large sovereign to default.  China is the only creditor nation with the size to force such a default. But China won't do it because it would be suicidal. China, the creditor, needs the developed world as much as the debtors need China and other developing, export-driven creditor nations. It is totally symbiotic, or co-dependent if one wants to be cynical about the situation.

To make my point about the relative size of creditors and debtors as it relates to default: I just made a good return recently on General Growth Properties (GGWPQ.pk) because I understood this dynamic. GGP was in technical default because of the financial crisis and its inability to roll forward short term debt taken on during the two to three years prior to the financial collapse. It was / is still cash flow positive and can cover the costs of its interest obligations, much like sovereigns with their ongoing ability to raise revenue from tax.  But GGP wisely had filed for bankruptcy as a single entity and had pulled all its various mall properties under the single corporate parent umbrella. This made GGP in effect, too big to fail. No single creditor had the legal power to force all the properties into a firesale. The court (Judge Gropper) saw it the same way and made the decision to force the parties to work out the mortgagtes (to refinance). When the creditors found out they were not going to be able to drive a hard bargain and take away the mortgaged property for much less than market value, they had to deal. Now GGP is close to exiting bankruptcy with all its property intact.

Even though sovereigns are unlikely to default in a cascading way, the global economy still remains weak.  It will take consumers and businesses a long time to regain their confidence to buy and bankers to lend.  For the overall American market, from this point on, the economy must improve significantly to get the SP500 much above 1200. But I think that is the higher probability over the next year or two as compared to a melt-down. Politically, I think President Obama is finding out that it isn't prudent to be too anti-business. He seems to have finally gotten the point that the top priority is jobs. Health care and environment are lower priority since there is no money to pay for them if we don't have near full employment and full tax revenues. We aren't hearing too much health care talk from the Admin or Congress the past 2-3 weeks. To demonstrate his new-found love for business, Obama just had T-Sec Geithner spell out the capital gains tax freeze and investment tax credits for 2010. This will help jump start business and improve consumer sentiment as people start getting jobs.

As Obama and other world government leaders turn their attention towards restarting business, the world economy will heal and the markets will respond. Asian stock markets might be a little overdone just because of being the crowded trade, so I have backed off on them, for now. I have moved almost everything back to domestic large cap stocks or energy / commodities. I think 2010 will be a "consolidation" year with only a little index movement, maybe from 1100 to 1250. 2011 might be a similar year, with gradual improvement from 1250 to 1400. That would get us back to May 2008 which was about where the final dive started (down to 666). Maybe we pull back 100 points (10-12%) somewhere in the next 2-3 years. But by 2014 we can pass 1550 and set new highs, if the government continues to be supportive of business and doesn't get too radical (seems more likely right now than 6 months ago).

I am buying up some of the banks that look like they are turning the corner and will be survivors. I have a bunch of the leveraged financial index, UYG, which is weighted towards the survivors like GS, JPM or WFC. But I also am buying some BAC now (as of two weeks ago). Even Citi might be a buy at this point, now that they have a plan to exit TARP. But I am passing on them for now.

Otherwise, my theme is Tech, commodities, energy and materials. Tech is due for a positive replacement / upgrade cycle after 10 years of being down.  Microsoft's (MSFT) Windows 7 should be the catalyst in 2010 once the IT budgets are approved. Just buy the XLK if you don't have any favorites. SMH is the semicon index which has more beta than the XLK. My favorites in commodities tend to the miners and energy stocks, though I have recently picked up some Potash (POT).  I also have call options on (FCX) and (BHP).  This is a better way to play the weak dollar trade than gold, in my book, as operating leverage contributes to performance and generates cash flow which actually has value to an investor.  They have all outperformed Gold in 2009.  Commodities and Energy will benefit from the global economic expansion that is the natural reaction to the collapse. I find it interesting that Suncor (SU) was going up the last two days while oil futures are going down. I find that a very positive sign. I have really loaded up on Pennwest (PWE) and Provident Energy (PVX) .

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Economics, Forecast

Natural Gas: It’s Time has Arrived

September 22nd, 2009 Brian No comments

I am a long term fan of and have posted pro-nat gas articles on this website in the past. It is weak now due to its "junk energy" status during an economic downturn. It is highly leveraged to the economy and does very well in a strong economy and very poorly in a weak economy. This is due to its primary use as an industrial energy supply and its seasonal use for building heating.

If (when) nat gas becomes a primary transportation fuel source alongside gasoline and diesel, its utility and value will soar. I think that time is coming soon. The easiest way to achieve a significant global reduction in green-house gas is by a conversion of transportation systems from gasoline to nat gas and electric power from coal to nat gas. This hasn't happened in the past for two reasons: (1) lack of distribution infrastructure (i.e. nat gas fuel stations on every corner); and (2) perception of uneven supply across the geography (nat gas is expensive to transport other than through a pipeline due to its low density as a gas). A third issue is the cost of the conversion of vehicles from gasoline to nat gas powered, but this is a manageable economic issue that can be addressed with tax policy, and is not a technology issue.

I see the Obama administration addressing the greenhouse gas problem through policies that favor nat gas. He will announce the framework of those policies today (Tuesday). Nat Gas is a good solution to provide energy independence and a cleaner environment. It provides a technology bridge to developing renewable energy sources like solar and hydrogen fuel cells. It will happen and should be the cornerstone of every portfolio.

The nat gas ETF, UNG, is flawed, but is the only pure play on nat gas pricing. The premium in the ETF due to a moratorium on adding futures to the ETF is down from 20% to 5%. That premium is manageable and makes UNG once again a decent way to play nat gas. North America energy producers are the other way to play nat gas: CHK, XTO, LINN, PWE, PVX, MRO, PGH are some of the stocks one can use to gain exposure to nat gas.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Uncategorized

Bullish Option Moves in Energy and Financials

September 17th, 2009 Brian 1 comment

I am making a bullish call and am selling UNG puts (Oct $18 - UNEVR) for $6.5 this Friday morning (September 18, 2009). While I don't like UNG longer term because I am concerned about the premium in the stock price (4.58% over today, but was almost 20% at end of August) coming out with a ruling from the CFTC, still it is for now the only pure play on nat gas prices. And I see those prices recovering to at least $5 just on the idea of an economic recovery and even before the inventory runs down.

Another Nat Gas play is PennWest (PWE), a major Canadian energy producer based in Calgary with more than 50% of its production in gas. I have owned PWE since 2002, in the form of Petrofund before that company's acquisition by PWE. Today I sold the December puts in PWE $15 for $1.60 (PWEXC). This gives me some upside from today's $14.40 price and downside protection to $13.40, which has been the recent base level for PWE. PWE was above $30 for two years up until July 2008 and has been over $40 in the past six years. A return to the $30 level will occur with a firming of Nat Gas prices above $8 / mmcf.

I also am buying more UYG calls. I see UYG at $10 by the end of the year and it is now just above $6. There is a lot of room for improvement in the banking sector, even though it has come a long way already. The sector was down 85% (XLF went from $38 in 2007 to $6) in March. UYG was above $20 just prior to the Lehman collapse. It has retraced much less than half of that. I think another 30% to the upside is very likely before the "V" is completed, bringing us back to August 2008 levels. A 30% move in XLF will be a 60% move in UYG.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , ,

A Short Term Turn in the Market?

July 9th, 2009 Brian No comments

Yesterday the SP500 hit 870 twice: at 12:00 and again at 2:00 Eastern. It held both times and ended the day at 879. 870 - 875 had been the SP500 target for weeks as the bottom of a trading range. So, the fact that it held, not once, but twice, is very encouraging. This forms a technical formation called a double bottom, which only means that an important level was tested  by traders more than once. The market trading bears didn't have enough selling power to push the index through that level for now. Any good earnings news like the better-than-expected Alcoa results yesterday will give the bulls more encouragement and may force out the bears at some point.

I noticed that all the cyclical / materials stocks were moving exactly with the SP500 all day Wednesday. This is an indication that materials and energy are a proxy for economic recovery. When the market feels the prospects for the economy become better, deep cyclicals and materials move higher. So made a bottom at around $43.50 at both times and SU made a bottom at around $25.75. For both high beta stocks, they are off by more than 20% in the past two weeks, which means they are in their own mini-bear markets. ( is off over 30% from its June high).

So, is this a good time to buy? The long term thesis is inflation to correct the Federal deficits and pay for growth in money supply / weakened dollar. Commodities / materials are the best way to play that move.  But is now the time? 

I am waiting as there is a lot of downside momentum in oil and basic metals (copper).  Many traders (probably too many for a contrarian like me), feel that oil is headed to $50.  But industry experts tell us that any price below $70 today will shut down supply, leading to higher prices at some point as demand exceeds supply.  I have small positions in energy (SU, PWE an UNG) but am out of basic materials (I normally use and BHP).  If the SP500 gets back above 900 with some conviction as shown by volume, I will consider adding to the above positions. I hope I can put money back in by next week.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Energy stocks, Trading